SCIgen: pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen
This
website generates a very convincing yet completely made up research paper
similar to one that computer science students would publish to get their
degrees. The 'paper' is filled with fake citations, data, and charts that, during
a cursory skim, look like legitimate. A typical research paper follows the
scientific method, starting with an Abstract, introduction, and background
information. Research papers are written in the past tense using a first person
account, so the generator uses sentence that utilizes past tenses. Research
papers also always reference to other research papers, using citations within
the paragraph and the author's name.
pandyland.net/random
Comic
strips are usually multiple slides of a drawing and dialogue text printed on
top. The random comic generator takes a random picture of 2 people with random
expressions and links them together to simulate a comic. Without reading the
words, the comic strip is characterized because of its visual and textual
conventions.
memegenerator.net
Memes
always have a set of certain images with text printed on top in white impact
bold font. Since memes are supposed to share a message on the internet, the
meme generator also produces a link. One specific convention of a meme is a
random picture. The pictures that the meme generator uses are all usually
pictures that weren't intended to be popular, like a still scene from movie or
someone's random yearbook picture.
Another genre generator: http://hackertyper.com/
Hackertyper
creates a random convincing looking computer program code by just mashing
random keys on the keyboard. It is inspired by the depiction of "hacking"
in movies where a character would pound keys with thier left and right fingers
to produce some form of code, which eventually allows him/her to hack the
system. The hackertyper displays green computer font text on a black background,
similar to something that some terminals use. Computer codes usually have
plenty of {} and / and ; and =
characters with indentation. Even pressing the left Alt key 3 times will give a
message box that says "Access Granted" so it is easy to convince
random people that you've hacked the computer.
These
generators are a good way to explore genre because each one produces different
products that follow the same conventions. In each case, the individual outputs
are not the same but they follow the same guidelines set by the person who
designed the program. For the research paper generator, a list of scientific
words are parsed to throw in. Scientist's names and links are also pulled from
a list. The paper was compiled from a random selection of predetermined
components. The attributes of the components are the conventions of the genre. The
comic strip had multiple tiles that were stringed together and overlaid words. The
meme generator allows the user to choose from a set of images that many other
memes have utilized. Text is inputted and displayed in the same color and font
as part of the convention of a meme. These generators cater to a specific
audience and, with the exception of the meme generator, can fool an audience
that is unfamiliar with the genre to believe it was real. This is because the
products have the external appearance and textual conventions of the real
thing, but the context is wrong. Genres can be distinguished without looking
too deeply because of how certain cues can be identified without reading.
I think you've done a good job at describing each of the website generator's conventions so that it makes it easier for someone who is unfamiliar with a genre to understand. And you're right about each generated product not having the same information, yet they all share the same conventions. That's cool that you pointed out the research paper being in past tense because I hadn't thought of that. However, for the comic generator, maybe you could have been more thorough by including specific conventions that make a comic strip a comic strip. The hacking generator sounds really interesting. Instantly, images from movies popped into my head that had to do with mega computer hackers so it made it easy for me to understand exactly what you were describing. Additionally, I think it's important that you mentioned that each genre caters to a specific audience because someone who is 80 probably won't know what a meme is the way our generation does. And I agree with you that their external appearance is what makes each genre specifically that genre.
ReplyDeleteYour presentation of the genres was accurate. It was interesting how you separated each genre into separate categories and then concluded with an analysis and realization of genre. However, I did not like how you structured your paper because for me the paper felt like it did not flow. It felt like four different paragraphs that were later unified under one final conclusion. However, great job on adding another site or genre generator to add strength and more depth to your project builder. Also I liked how you analyzed the computer science research paper. I did not realize that the paper was in past tense until you pointed it out. I would have never thought of writing the paper in past tense as a convention. Great job on thinking out of the box and illuminating this possible convention. Overall your project builder was intriguing and beneficial.
ReplyDeleteNagase,
ReplyDeleteI forgot you were a photographer. That’s a very special, unique quality that sets you apart from most folks. Good stuff. (For the record, though, the only thing that CA has on NJ is the weather.)
PB1A: Your analysis of YouTube comments was fanTASTIC. EXCELLENT job. You knocked this out of the park, and I absolutely love’n’adore how thoughtfully and systematically you looked at this crazy/often-horrible genre. This is my favorite PB yet, and I’m super-happy that you shared this in class. Backing it up with specific, embedded examples was the icing on the cake. (I’d feel like I was doing my part if I didn’t mention this, but to expand this, you could look at the standard word/character length, the use of hyperlinks, the presence of advertisements, the presence of “troll’ users, the nature of follow-up/reply comments…)
PB1B: Great spot on the “past tense, first-person” perspective for the SciGen pieces. Your analysis of the cartoon and meme generators was a bit thin in my opinion. Specific evidence from the generated comic strips could have, I think, strengthened your claims. I want you to look hard at this stuff, and that includes being precise about what visual patterns keep continuously surfacing, as well as how, exactly, the writers/illustrators are achieving specific (usually intentional) effects in an audience. Getting into the rhetorical features too—audience, purpose, tone, context—could have been another way to elaborate on this entry a bit more.
Thanks for passing hackertyper along. It was equal parts cool/weird/scary (ie, that I was getting hacked).
Grade for both PBs: 5/5
PB1A: “Check plus plus.”
PB1B: “Check/check minus.”
Z